"What would be the harm in that?"
After some hesitation, he explained that they would worry about the welfare of those people...maybe lose some sleep over it. He concluded with
"I just can't have them thinking that they can change the world...that's just not realistic."
From his statement comes the following logic:
1. Helping others isn't to be taken that seriously
2. I would rather people live in poverty and suffering than for my children to worry
3. It is irrational to think that one person can make a difference.
For more than a year, I have taught "Contemporary World Culture" at ITT Tech here in Nashville. In it, we spend a lot of time studying the social and cultural impact of globalization. This concept of a global corporation depends on consumerism - this idea, born out of the end of authoritarian and monarchical political structures. This was the birth of the middle class. In this setting, nobility could be attained by anyone as long as ones possessions outnumbered those of thy neighbor. Simply put - the more stuff you had, the more important you were. Sound familiar?
Just as you can find opposing arguments for almost ANY issue today, there are opposing arguments concerning globalization and consumerism. As you could imagine, my class often turns into a forum for a good ol' political brawl - especially with the recent emergence of the whole Occupy movement. Occasionally, religious convictions and/or spiritual beliefs become cannon fodder. Though I always keep my objectivity, the questions concerning those convictions and beliefs have snowballed for me personally.
It only took a moment to realize that, of the people who have influenced the world for Christ, I couldn't think of one who was a beacon for globalization and/or consumerism. I've come to believe that it is impossible for the ideas of consumerism and Christianity to coexist within a believer.
In his book The Irresistible Revolution Shane Claiborne writes,
“What if Jesus really meant it?” What if Jesus was serious when he challenges us to an upside-down way of living that includes embracing the poor, loving the enemy..."
Maybe I'm nuts...but I truly believe that Jesus meant what he said about helping the poor, loving the rejects, and loving others more than ourselves. I am in no way suggesting that I am above the influence. I'm simply asking that you take the time to reflect on it. Whether or not you realize it now, I think you'll find that it has influenced you as well...possibly through this statement:
"If I give that guy money, he'll just go buy alcohol with it."
In that one statement, judgement is passed and a human being becomes capital in a banking transaction. We want to see return on our investment. We can't be wasting our hard-earned money for no return, right?
Give because God leads you to give. Do not do it for ANY other reason. When we compare the death of Christ to our ridiculous successes, we are ALL piss-poor investments. If we listed every sin in the English language, the word "grace" would still be wide enough to cover them all.
Is it really unrealistic to think that we can make a difference? I don't think so. However, I think it IS unrealistic to think that we can do so while on the pursuit of consumerism. To make a difference or To buy more stuff...To be broken or to be guilt-free... Aren't those the real decisions. Which will you choose?


